|
Post by account_disabled on Dec 9, 2023 9:08:48 GMT
Questioning by ZUS of concluded mandate contracts. During its inspection, ZUS may also question the correctness of the concluded contract. For exame, it may question the conclusion of a mandate contract which, in its opinion, meets the criteria for recognizing it as an emoyment contract or reverse cases. Different codes will then be created to cover emoyees with the appropriate title to social security, as well as the settlement of social contributions will look different. In one of the judgments of the Supreme Court, reference number III UK of October, you can read that the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court indicates that ZUS is entitled to examine the validity of an emoyment contract, as well as civil law contracts in philippines photo editor order to determine coverage by social insurance. The Supreme Court has repeatedly drawn attention to irregularities in connection with ZUS's classification of emoyment contracts as sham activities and at the same time aimed at circumventing the Act by emoyers. This also includes judgment of the Supreme Court emphasized that the pension authority has the power to verify "artificially" high remuneration, and may also question its "artificial" lowering in order to avoid or minimize the need to bear public burdens, which is often inspected There is no definition of concluded contracts that would clearly dispel any doubts arising.
|
|